Summary: It’s David’s reign. Again. Also, there’s a bunch of lists of people’s families and descendants, which are even more boring than rereading a story I just read.
Originally, I wanted to write about God in Numbers. But then I realized I had some things to say about the Israelites, and I figured “Well, I’ll get back to God when I don’t have anything else to talk about.” And now I get to write some more on a story I’ve already read and discussed, because 1 Chronicles and 2 Samuel are pretty much the same exact thing. Also, I get to pull from old books because this book is just pulling stories from old books, and these are my rules and I say so.
So, God!
The tough thing about God is that, of course, we don’t really know anything about him (and I’m not capitalizing the word him because I am following the format of the Good News Bible, which is the translation I am reading). He apparently has a plan, though we mere mortals can never know it. He sets rules about killing, among other things, then orders his people to break those rules on a whim. He supposedly never makes mistakes, but wishes that he had never made Saul king. David thinks he wants fame (1 Chronicles 17:24), but he has no real way of knowing that. So the question is: What’s up with God?
Let’s start out answering this question by taking a trip in the Wayback Machine! There are some things in Numbers that I was disappointed I didn’t get to talk about. Like how, in Numbers 11, God gets all pissy about the Israelites having the temerity to complain that they didn’t have any meat to eat, and kills some of them. Or how in Numbers 14, God asks Moses (not a typo) how much longer the Israelites are going to complain about their lives being shitty, as if Moses is the one who would know that, Deity-Who-Is-Telling-Moses-What-To-Do. Or how in Numbers 20, God kills Aaron for not acknowledging that God was the one who made water come out of a rock, as if that’s an appropriate punishment for that crime.
Also, I have no idea how this works: “That night God came to Balaam and said, ‘If these men have come to ask you to go with them, get ready and go, but do only what I tell you. So the next morning Balaam saddled his donkey and went with the Moabite leaders.” (Numbers 22:20-21). That seems pretty clear to me. And here’s the very next thing that is written in the book: “God was angry that Balaam was going…” (Numbers 22:22). It’s frustrating how utterly bizarre this book is sometimes.
I guess the striking thing about the Bible – the whole Bible, not just any one book – is how it really doesn’t agree with the modern notion of God. What I’ve always heard is that God is infallible, omnipotent, omniscient, and all-loving.
First, God isn’t remotely infallible. Way back in Exodus 32:10, God said this: “Now, don’t try to stop me. I am angry with [the Israelites] and I am going to destroy them. Then I will make you and your descendants into a great nation.” Then in 32:11-13, Moses talks to him a little and in 32:14, we have this: “So the LORD changed his mind and did not bring on his people the disaster he had threatened.” And in Numbers 16, Moses and Aaron change God’s mind about killing a bunch of people by burning some incense, and there’s also the little matter of Saul, whom God regretted making king of Israel (“The LORD said to Samuel, ‘I am sorry that I made Saul king…'” (1 Samuel 15:10-11)). So, not infallible.
What about all-powerful? There’s a lot to back that one up. But one of my examples above is also proof that he’s not all-powerful, and it also debunks all-knowing, so that makes my life easier. God had to ask Moses (that’s still not a typo) how much longer the Israelites were going to complain. To those of you who might say that he was trying to teach Moses a lesson, I say bullshit. That’s bullshit when some troll on the Internet tries to justify his existence, and it’s bullshit here. But that passage does show that God doesn’t have the power to see the future, and that obviously he doesn’t have the knowledge of the future. So, not omnipotent or omniscient.
And all-loving? Seriously? I have to do this? The God who kills people for complaining about not having food is all-loving? The God who orders the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people who are just living in Canaan making pots or farming or whatever, that’s an all-loving God? The God who kills on a whim? I don’t think that’s what all-loving means, but thanks for trying, book.
Some other notes…
- 2 Samuel 24 starts out with a story about how “On another occasion, the LORD was angry with Israel and he made David bring trouble on them” by taking a census, which was apparently a sin. But fine, I miss the sin, but it’s there and God made him do it, which is still a little morally questionable but maybe he had the punishment (a plague on his nation that killed seventy thousand Israelites who again did nothing wrong) coming? I don’t know. But 1 Chronicles 21, which tells the same story about a census and God’s wrath and a plague, starts out like this: “Satan wanted to bring trouble on the people of Israel, so he made David decide to take a census.” If I didn’t know who Satan was coming in to this book, that would have been so unbelievably confusing. Also, pick one.
- Actually, how about a compromise? Maybe Buddha made him take the census! Glad I could solve that little problem.
- I don’t see why David should get credit for making Solomon’s sweet temple. I mean, if this is how it happened then why wasn’t that mentioned in the original story of how the temple was designed and built? I’ll tell you why: Because it’s not how it happened. Someone wanted to beef up the legend of David, so he added this to the story. It’s bullshit. And it shouldn’t be surprising that in my essay about God, I’ve used that word multiple times.